论文部分内容阅读
目的对商环与传统包皮环切术的临床疗效进行对比研究分析。方法 100例包皮过长、包茎患者随机分为研究组和对照组,每组50例,研究组接受商环包皮环切术治疗,对照组接受传统包皮环切术治疗,对两组患者临床疗效进行观察对比。结果研究组手术时间、术中出血量、疼痛程度相比对照组明显更低;研究组不良反应发生率4.0%相比对照组34.0%明显更低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论商环包皮环切术治疗包皮过长、包茎临床疗效显著,可有效改善患者手术情况,且无明显不良反应,具备临床推广应用价值。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical curative effect between commercial ring and traditional circumcision. Methods 100 cases of prepuce, phimosis were randomly divided into study group and control group, 50 cases in each group. The study group received commercial circumcision and the control group received conventional circumcision. The clinical efficacy of the two groups Observe and contrast. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and pain were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.0% vs. 34.0%, P <0.05). Conclusion Surgical circumcision is an effective way to improve the foreskin circumcision and clinical efficacy of phimosis. It can effectively improve the operation condition of patients and has no obvious adverse reactions, so it has the value of clinical popularization and application.