恢复性司法视野下的刑事案件“私了”

来源 :天津商学院学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:FlyinginSky
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
刑事案件私了的地位可谓尴尬,一方面刑事法治的完善禁止刑事案件的私了;另一方面,在实践中刑事案件的私了却大量存在。从当事人的视角,往往是利益权衡后的理性选择。但刑事案件私了弊端众多,游离于国家秩序之外,难以实现社会控制。世界上许多国家,在恢复性司法理念下,刑事和解制度得到普遍实施。刑事和解制度是规范化、制度化的私了。我国可以引入恢复性司法理念,完善刑事和解制度,实现刑事案件私了的规范化。 The private status of criminal cases can be described as embarrassing. On the one hand, the improvement of the criminal law prohibits the criminal cases from being private; on the other hand, in practice, the criminal cases are private but exist in large numbers. From the perspective of the parties, it is often the rational choice after weighing interests. However, many criminal cases have their own drawbacks, leaving them outside the state order and making it difficult to achieve social control. In many countries in the world, under the concept of restorative justice, the criminal reconciliation system has been universally implemented. The system of criminal reconciliation is standardized and institutionalized. China can introduce the concept of restorative justice, improve the system of criminal reconciliation, and realize the standardization of criminal cases.
其他文献
社会和谐是中国特色社会主义的本质属性,是国家富强、民族振兴、人民幸福的重要保证。从学理和历史的双层角度看,构建和谐社会的关键在于重塑秩序与信任之间的有机关联,前者是实
从GATT至WTO,其发展历史显现出两个趋势,一是GATT的作用、权威性由强到弱,二是发展中国家参与的态度由消极变为积极.当代西方政治经济学和马克思主义政治经济学都认为,国际经