有为社会需要思想市场

• 作 者: 鲍勇剑
• 机 构: 加拿大莱桥大学管理学院,
• 出 处: 董事会
• 发表日期: 2017年01期

回到路径之争,为何我们常常围绕老问题做新辩论?我们的关注点也许需要改变,需要问“每一轮讨论的新问题是什么?”像培根建议的那样,浸淫到实践和实验的观察中去,我们的策略问题才会不断进化2016年下半年,林毅夫、田国强和张维迎教授之间关于“有为政府”还是“有限政府”展开大讨论(下称“路径之争”)。后续投入“战火”的文章也毫不逊色,可谓众人拾柴火焰高。讨论的价值已经超过具体话题本身。在中国经济现实和管理理论亟需对应的当口,开启了一个有为社会的思想市场非常必要。他们的讨论呼唤2017新一年中更多的思想竞争。

Back to the path to debate, why do we often make new debates around old questions? Our focus may need to change. “What are the new questions at every turn?” “Like Bacon suggests, In the second half of 2016, a large discussion was held between Professor Lin Yi-Fu, Tian Guo-Qiang and Professor Zhang Wei-Ying on the issue of ”having a government“ or ”limited government“ ”The battle of paths“). Subsequent input ”war " article is no less, it can be said that everyone firewood flame high. The value of the discussion has gone beyond the specific topic itself. In China, the economic reality and the management theory are in urgent need of corresponding correspondence. It is very necessary to start a promising ideological market. Their discussion calls for more intellectual competition in the new year 2017.