论文部分内容阅读
随着高一历史新教材在全国大部分省市的推广,笔者不仅参加了暑期新教材的培训,而且现正教授新教材,通过研究与教学实践,笔者认为关于第二次鸦片战争前英法美向中国政府提出修约的叙述(法美借口《黄埔条约》和《望厦条约》有12年后修约的规定)是欠妥的,甚至是错误的,笔者查阅了许多史料,甚至人教版教师教学用书都无法考证中法《黄埔条约》中规定有12年后修约内
With the promotion of new high school history textbooks in most provinces and cities across the country, the author not only participated in the training of new summer textbooks, but also taught new textbooks. Through research and teaching practice, I believe that before the Second Opium War, the United Kingdom, France, and the United States The narration of the amendment to the Chinese government (French and American excuse “The Huangpu Treaty” and “Wangxia Treaty” has 12 years of amendments) is not proper or even wrong. The author has consulted many historical materials and even taught The version of the teacher’s teaching book could not be verified in the “Huangpu Treaty” stipulated in the revised agreement within 12 years