论文部分内容阅读
在电影的理论方法上,目前似乎存在着类似于内容与形式的分歧,一种观点认为,电影语言的分析才是电影理论批评的正轨,另一种观点则强调电影的文化内涵和文化制约。我们倾向于后一种观点。当然,不能简单地把前者划为形式的批评,后者划为内容的批评。事实上这两种观点都强调内容与形式的不可分离性,所不同的是两者的视角有所侧重:前者认为形式本身就包含了内容,是从形式出发的;后者认为内容赋予了形式的生命,是从内容着眼的。正是在这个意义上,我们才说它们类似于内容与形式的分歧。在一个多元化的时代,对于理论方法很难
At present there seems to be a disagreement between contents and forms in the theory and method of film. One view is that movie language analysis is just the right track of film theory criticism, while the other viewpoint emphasizes the cultural connotation and cultural restriction of the film. We tend to the latter view. Of course, the former can not be simply classified as a form of criticism, which is classified as content criticism. In fact, both of these views emphasize the inseparability of content and form, with the exception that the perspectives of both emphasize: the former considers the form itself to contain the content and proceeds from the form; the latter considers the content as formal The life is from the content. It is in this sense that we say that they are similar to the disagreement between content and form. In a pluralistic era, it is hard for theoretical methods