论文部分内容阅读
在八一年一月号《语文教学与研究》上,刊登了龚正荣同志所写《关于议论文教学中的逻辑运用》一文,其中有这么几句话: 间接反驳常用的方法有:(1)反证法。它是举出同对方论点相矛盾的论点,根据“两个互相矛盾的论断一定有一个是对的”这个道理,直接证明自己举出的论点是正确的,从而反过来间接证明对方的论点是错误的。这里,作者似乎在解释“独立地证明与反驳的论题相排斥的新论题”这一方法,只是解释得有些毛病,并非如作者所说,解释的是反证法。
In the January/January issue of the “Language Teaching and Research”, the paper “Comments on Logical Applications in Argumentation Teaching” written by Comrade Gong Zhengrong was published. There are a few words in it: Indirect rebuttals commonly used methods are: (1) Countervailing evidence. It is an argument that contradicts the arguments of the other party. According to the principle that “the two contradictory arguments must be correct,” it directly proves that the arguments he cited are correct, which in turn indirectly proves that the arguments of the other party are Incorrect. Here, the author seems to be explaining that the method of “independently proving the new thesis that rejects the argument against the refutation” is only explaining something wrong. It is not the author’s explanation that explains the anti-evidence method.