论文部分内容阅读
规范构成要件要素的发现,改变了传统构成要件理论,使刑法学意义上事实概念和规范概念之间区分更加具有相对性,存在事实的规范化和规范的事实化。立法或者司法,都应该立足于变动的现实,对事实与规范之间在法律意义上的评价、专业知识意义上的评价、社会一般人评价之间合理界定和取舍。基于事实与规范的互动,刑法解释和司法诠释成为一种必然的选择,一般人评价也必须再予提倡。
The discovery of elements of normative constitutional elements has changed the traditional theory of constitutional elements so that the distinction between factual concepts and normative concepts in the criminal law sense is more relatable and there is the de facto standardization and normative de factoization. Legislation or judiciary should all be based on the reality of change, on the legal significance between the facts and the norm, on the professional knowledge, on the reasonable definition and choice between the ordinary people. Based on the interaction of facts and norms, interpretation of criminal law and interpretation of the judiciary has become an inevitable choice, and the evaluation of ordinary people must be advocated again.