论文部分内容阅读
看了几本黄仁宇先生的书,特别刚看完最新增订的《中国——一部大历史》英文本(China—AMacro History),脑子里总转着“历史的长期性”这几个字。黄氏会通上下几千年的中国史(或欧洲史),都是在注释这几个字。他自己明确说:“作者的用意就是要把历史的长期合理性确定下来。”(《中国——一部大历史》,页269)我前曾有文略及于此,读了这本书后觉得前文意有未尽,于是就写了这一篇。黄氏的历史观其实与我们所熟悉的历史唯物史观十分相象。从根本上说,都认为,任何一个民族(特别是一个有古老历史文明的大国)从远古到今天的发展和演变取了怎样的轨迹,不是由谁的主观愿
After reading a few books by Mr. Huang Renyu, especially after reading the newly-updated China-AMACRO History, the words “the long-term history” turn to the mind. Huang will pass thousands of years up and down the Chinese history (or European history), are annotated these words. He himself made it clear that “the author’s intention is to establish the long-term rationality of history.” (China - A Great History, p. 269) I read the book and read it After I felt that the preceding article had not been completed, I wrote this one. Huang’s view of history is quite similar to the historical materialism we are familiar with. Fundamentally, it is believed that no one’s race, especially a great historic country with ancient civilization, took a trajectory from ancient times to today’s development and evolution, not by whose subjective will