论文部分内容阅读
医疗事故鉴定结论只是证据的一种,在被法院采信之前,并不当然地具有法律上的证据效力。鉴定机构应具有超脱性,可设在司法部下,实行一次鉴定制度。允许患方选择异地鉴定,实行鉴定回避制度。在鉴定书中应有各种不同意见的记载,不能只有一种意见的记载,首席鉴定人应对鉴定书上的真实性、合法性负责。明确鉴定时限。
Medical malpractice appraisal conclusion is only a kind of evidence, before being taken by the court, it does not of course have legal evidence. The accreditation body should have detachability and can be set up under the Ministry of Justice to implement an appraisal system. Allowing the patient to choose the remote identification, the implementation of the appraisal avoidance system. There should be records of various opinions in the appraisal book. There can be no record of only one opinion. The chief appraiser should be responsible for the authenticity and legality of the appraisal. Clearly identify the time limit.