论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究重度颅脑损伤患者选择常规开颅与标准大骨瓣减压的治疗效果。方法:将98例重度颅脑损伤患者分为两组,观察组给予标准大骨瓣减压治疗,对照组给予常规开颅骨瓣减压治疗,比较治疗效果。结果:观察组治疗总体有效率83.67,对照组65.31%,差异显著(P<0.05),观察组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与常规开颅骨瓣减压术治疗相比,标准大骨瓣减压治疗重度颅脑损伤临床效果更加显著。
Objective: To investigate the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury in patients with conventional craniotomy and standard decompressive craniectomy. Methods: 98 cases of severe craniocerebral injury were divided into two groups. The observation group was treated with standard decompressive craniectomy. The control group was treated with conventional craniotomy flap decompression. The therapeutic effects were compared. Results: The total effective rate of the observation group was 83.67 and that of the control group was 65.31% (P <0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the conventional decompressive craniotomy, the clinical effect of standard decompressive craniectomy for severe craniocerebral injury is more significant.