论文部分内容阅读
本文以张隆溪和童明两位先生的研究为起点,详细梳理《老子》中“道”的不同内涵,并与西方的“逻各斯”相参照;以结构主义的二元对立体系和解构主义的“反逻各斯中心主义”为切入点,具体论述“道”与“逻各斯”的相通和相异之处。试图指出两位先生研究的偏颇之处,说明他们的研究没有注意到“道”的复杂性和多面性。本文最后指出,在当今世界的跨文化交际中,中国的“道”与西方的“逻各斯”应该互相借鉴,从而在融合中得以再构。
Based on the research of Zhang Longxi and Tong Ming, the thesis combs the different connotations of “Tao ” in “Lao Tzu ” and makes a comparison with “Logos ” in the West. System and deconstruction of “anti-logocentrism” as a starting point, specifically discussed “Tao ” and “Logos ” the similarities and differences. Attempts to point out the biases of the two scholarly studies suggest that their research did not notice the complexity and versatility of “Tao ”. Finally, the article points out that in the cross-cultural communication in today’s world, China’s “Taoism” and Western “Logos” should learn from each other so as to be reconstructed in the process of integration.