论文部分内容阅读
不作为侵权与作为侵权是侵权责任法上侵权行为的两个重要的表现形式,在我国现有的侵权法规范意义语境下,作为侵权是侵权行为的主要表现形式,但是伴随社会的发展,不作为侵权的表现形式愈趋多样化。由于我国在立法上对于不作为侵权的规范相对比较少以及司法实务中面临的不作为侵权的案例频发,那么就需要通过对不作为侵权做进一步的理论研究,从而扩大侵权法的适用范围并为不作为侵权中侵权人的责任承担提供理论基础。本文试图从自由理论、社会共同体理论和成本理论这三个方面来阐释作为义务产生的理论依据。
Infringement and infringement as infringement are two important manifestations of infringement on the Tort Liability Act. In the context of the existing norms of tort law in our country, infringement is the main manifestation of infringement. However, with the development of society, The manifestations of non-infringement are increasingly diversified. Because our country has relatively few norms of non-infringement in the legislation and infringement of inaction infringement in the judicial practice, we need to do further theoretical research on infringement of inaction, so as to expand the scope of application of the law of infringement It provides a theoretical basis for not assuming the responsibility of the infringer in infringement. This article tries to explain the theoretical basis of obligation as the three aspects of freedom theory, social community theory and cost theory.