论文部分内容阅读
自《中华人民共和国物权法》颁布以来,我国在立法上确定了物权法定的基本原则。物权法定的内涵是指物权的种类、内容、效力以及公示方法由法律规定,原则上不能由法律之外的规范性文件进行规定,也不能允许当事人自由创设物权的种类以及确定物权的内容、效力和公示方法。(1)在实务中,物权法定原则决定了物权的创设、变动、以及消灭。然而,就债权转让后若债权人未一并将物权抵押权变更登记至债权受让人,此时抵押权效力是否及于受让人?实务中存在不同观点。本文主要结合《物权法》等相关法律以及相关案例就该问题进行探讨。供理论界与实务界参考。
Since the promulgation of the “Property Law of the People’s Republic of China”, our country has basically established the basic principle of the statutory real right in legislation. The connotation of the legal right of real right means that the type, content, effect and publicity method of the real right are stipulated by law, in principle, it can not be stipulated by the normative documents outside the law, nor can the parties be allowed to freely create the kinds of real right and determine the real right Content, effectiveness and publicity methods. (1) In practice, the legal principle of real right determines the creation, change and elimination of real right. However, if the obligee does not record the change in the real right mortgage right after the assignment of the obligee’s claim to the assignee of the obligee’s rights, then whether the obligee’s right is different from that of the assignee? This article mainly discusses the issue with the relevant laws such as “Property Law” and related cases. For the theoretical and practical reference.