论文部分内容阅读
五四运动中,“奸商”被认为不爱国,为人痛恨,被惩罚也就天经地义。惩罚以扣留、没收、焚毁其日货和罚款为常见,对“奸商”之身体与名誉攻击也不少见。惩罚决定通常由国民大会、各界联合会、学生会或同业组织以“民意”、“公意”的名义做出。现代民权理论与民族主义使惩罚获得道义上的合法性,但其实施遭遇诸多困境。虽有“民意”作为其权威来源,但并无完备的执行机构。民间团体内部也常为惩罚问题发生分歧,各团体的利益差别、对运动成本——收益分摊不均是重要原因。地方当局对抵货的态度也给惩罚带来变数。惩罚“奸商”虽多违法,但因占据道义至高点而获得民众支持。这表明,当国家不能为社会寻求正义付诸行动时,社会便会撇开国家,自己实施正义行动。
During the May 4th Movement, “profiteers ” was considered unpatriotic, hateful and punished. Penalties for detention, confiscation, burnt their Japanese goods and fines for the common, “profiteers ” body and reputation attack is not uncommon. Punishment decisions are usually made by the National Assembly, federations of all walks of life, student unions or inter-bank organizations in the name of “public opinions” and “public opinions.” The theory of modern civil rights and nationalism have made the punishment moral and legal, but its implementation has encountered many difficulties. Although “public opinion ” as its authoritative source, but there is no complete implementing agency. Disputes over punishments are also often found within civil society. Differences in interest among various groups and uneven distribution of benefits to benefits are the main reasons. Local authorities have also brought variable penalties to the attitude of the goods. Punish “profiteers ” Although more illegal, but because of occupying the highest point of morality and popular support. This shows that when the state can not act for the community to seek justice, society will put aside its own country and implement its own just actions.