论文部分内容阅读
Background and study aims: The advent of magnification endoscopy may allow the macroscopic detection of unrecognized villous atrophy in patients with unsuspected coeliac disease. In addition, it may also be possible to use this method to assess the degree of villous atrophy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of zoom endoscopy for the macroscopic evaluation of villous atrophy, in comparison with histological evaluation. Patients and methods: The zoom endoscope provided a magnification capability of × 115. A scoring system (Z score) was devised for grading the appearances of villous atrophy: “ Z1“ for normal mucosa, “ Z2” for stunted villi, “ Z3“ for markedly stunted villi (with ridges and pits) and “ Z4” for a flat mucosa. A total of 53 consecutive patients with treated coeliac disease were followed up over almost 2 years using the Olympus GIF- Q240Z zoom endoscope; a total of 80 procedures were carried out. Four biopsies from the second part of the duodenum were taken from each patient for histological assessment. Histological assessment of villous atrophy was made by a pathologist blinded to the Z score. The correlation between the Z score and the histological score was assessed using the weighted kappa method. Results: The kappa score for the correlation between the macroscopic assessment of villous atrophy and the histology was 0.631, indicating fair to good reproducibility. Agresti s method revealed a very strong baseline association between the two methods (P < 0.001). Zoom endoscopy had a positive predictive value of 83% and a negative predictive value of 77% in detecting villous atrophy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that zoom endoscopy may be valuable in assessing the degree of villous atrophy. However, further studies are needed to assess its efficacy in routine practice as a screening or case- finding tool.
Background and research aims: The advent of magnification endoscopy may allow the macroscopic detection of unrecognized villous atrophy in patients with unsuspected coeliac disease. In addition, it may also be possible to use this method to assess the degree of villous atrophy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of zoom endoscopy for the macroscopic evaluation of villous atrophy, in comparison with histological evaluation. Patients and methods: The zoom endoscope provided a magnification capability of × 115. A scoring system (Z score) was devised for grading the appearances of villous atrophy: “Z1” for normal mucosa, “Z2” for stunted villi, “Z3” for markedly stunted villi (with ridges and pits) and “Z4” for a flat mucosa. A total of 53 consecutive patients with treated coeliac disease were followed up over almost 2 years using the Olympus GIF-Q240Z zoom endoscope; a total of 80 procedures were carried out. Four biopsies from the second part of the duoden Histological assessment of villous atrophy was made by a pathologist blinded to the Z score. The correlation between the Z score and the histological score was assessed using the weighted kappa method. Results: The kappa score for the correlation between the macroscopic assessment of villous atrophy and the histology was 0.631, indicating fair to good reproducibility. Agresti’s method revealed a very strong baseline association between the two methods (P <0.001). Zoom endoscopy had a positive predictive value of 83 % and a negative predictive value of 77% in detecting villous atrophy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that zoom endoscopy may be valuable in assessing the degree of villous atrophy. However, further studies are needed to assess its efficacy in routine practice as a screening or case- finding tool.