论文部分内容阅读
一稿两投,文章名家自不屑为,严肃的作者也不肯干。但是,目前在一些业余作者中,一稿两投甚至多投的现象,却颇流行。据说是为了防止编辑犯“官僚主义”。事情该怎么看?常见报刊编辑和工人们费劲地编排出一篇可用之稿后,发现别家报刊已登出来了,于是不得不又忙着拆活,倒版,大家一番辛苦白费,都觉得“受了捉弄”。又见有的文章,别的报刊虽已登出,但编者疏于查看,造成重登,“吃了别人嚼过的馍”,人们也不舒心。因此,我想之又想,得出结论:还是要反对一稿两投。两投、多投成风,流弊良多,绝非“文坛盛事”。就在不久前,有位朋友写的文章,两家一小一大的报纸先后刊登,一字不差。莫非他也在搞一稿两投?我当面提出质询。他叫苦不迭,赶忙解释:“我只给了小报,没往大报投。大报登了又不说明是转载,可冤枉我了!”
A draft two vote, article famous disdain for, serious writers refuse to do. However, at present, among some amateur authors, the one-vote or even multi-vote investment is quite popular. It is said to prevent editors from committing “bureaucracy.” What should I do? Common newspaper editors and workers who strenuously choreographed a usable draft and found that other newspapers and magazines have been logged out, so they had to work hard to demolish and print the pages again. “Tricked.” See also some articles, although other newspapers have been out, but the editor neglected to view, resulting in re-registration, “eat other people chewing the bream,” people are not comfortable. Therefore, I thought for a while and reached the conclusion: I still have to oppose a draft of the two manuscripts. Two casts, cast more into the wind, abuses a lot, not “literary event.” Not long ago, a friend wrote an article, two newspapers one by one large and one after another published, without a word. Could he also engage in a draft two vote? I personally face the question. He complained, hurriedly explained: "I only gave the tabloid, did not go to the big newspaper to vote.