论文部分内容阅读
12月9日,中国科学院向社会发布了《中国科学院院士科学道德自律准则》。这一准则包括:坚持真理、反对弄虚作假:坚持严肃、严格、严密的科学态度,反对学术上的浮躁浮夸作风:坚决抵制科技界的腐败和违规行为:积极发扬学术民主,充分尊重学术领域中的不同意见。警惕和反对学霸作风;尊重合作者和他人的劳动和权益,反对不属实的署名和侵占他人成果.反对参与谋取不正当利益的行为,抵制和反对对科研成果进行新闻炒作;在参与各种推荐、评审、鉴定、答辩和评奖活动中,坚持公平、公正的原则,不徇私情等内容。这一准则颁布后,引起了国内外舆论的广泛关注。有媒体称这是“中国院士的十条戒律”。那么,在科学学术界和社会上,如何看待这一准则呢?
December 9, Chinese Academy of Sciences released to the society, “CAS academician self-discipline of scientific ethics.” Adhere to the serious, strict and rigorous scientific attitude and oppose academic impetuosity and flamboyance: resolutely resist corruption and irregularities in the scientific and technological circles: actively carry forward academic democracy and fully respect academic standards Different views. Guard against and oppose the style of interrogation; respect the labor and interests of collaborators and others, oppose false signatures and appropriation of others' achievements, oppose participation in seeking improper benefits, boycott and oppose the speculation of scientific research results, Recommendation, review, appraisal, defense and awards activities, adhere to the principle of fairness and justice, not content such as personal affair. After the promulgation of this standard, it has aroused widespread public concern at home and abroad. Some media said this is “Chinese Academy of Sciences ten commandments.” So, in the scientific community and academia, how to treat this criterion?