论文部分内容阅读
知识产权法定主义主张由法律对知识产权的重要内容加以明确规定。法定主义的提倡者对劳动价值论进行了深刻的批判,认为该理论是导致权利扩张的罪魁祸首,并通过功利主义寻找知识产权法定的理论依据。知识产权法定主义与劳动价值论之矛盾,在知识产权的观念及其法律适用问题上体现得尤为明显。实际上,无论是论证知识产权的正当性,还是审判实践中的法律适用,一元主义都存在严重的“能力不足”。两种理论从不同的角度对知识产权的合理性进行论证,相辅相成,并非绝然对立。
Intellectual property legal doctrine advocated by the law on the important elements of intellectual property to be clearly defined. The proponents of statutoryism deeply criticized the theory of labor value, arguing that the theory is the culprit leading to the expansion of rights and seeking the theoretical basis of the legal statute of intellectual property through utilitarianism. The contradiction between the legal doctrine of intellectual property rights and the labor theory of value is particularly evident in the concept of intellectual property and its application of law. In fact, monopolyism has serious “inadequate capacity” both in demonstrating the legitimacy of intellectual property and in the application of law in trial practice. The two theories demonstrate the rationality of intellectual property from different perspectives, complement each other and are not absolutely antagonistic.