论文部分内容阅读
当美国最高法院的大法官们在“南北战争至新政”期间,于美国最高法院的第一个能动主义时期,据据正当程序条款,将各种各样的社会与经济福利立法,关于规定最高工时、最低工资和价格控制等等的法规判为违宪的时侯,不少同时代的和后来的美国法学家都指责最高法院成了第三立法院。按照许多批评者的说法,这一时期的大法官们利用关于司法程序的神话而塞进了他们自己的自由主义的政治与经济学说并为美国的大企业订立了“大宪章”。然而,经
When the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court during the period of “the Civil War to the New Deal” and the Supreme Court of the United States in the first period of activism, according to the due process clause, various social and economic welfare legislation, At the time when the laws that provided for the maximum working hours, minimum wages and price controls were unconstitutional, many contemporaries and later American jurists accused the Supreme Court of the third Legislature. According to many critics, the judges of this period used their myths in judicial proceedings to plunge into their own liberal political and economic doctrine and set the “Magna Carta” for America’s big business. However,