论文部分内容阅读
在荧屏上,敬一丹显得有点与众不同,那样朴实,那样随和,活脱脱一个大姐形象;在书本里,敬一丹同样显得有点与众不同,她喜欢观察,喜欢思索,而不是唠唠叨叨地自我炫耀。 从本书可以看出,敬一丹是能写的。虽是千字左右的短文,但她在谋篇布局上相当用心,名为随笔,并不随意;她的语言简洁、明快,往往能一语中的而又不失文采;尤为难能可贵的是,她能“放出自己的眼光”,很多看法自出机杼,而在文章中又不故作沉思状。 敬一丹不太喜欢旁征博引,这使她在一定程度上避免了文史知识方面的差错;但在词语运用方面,仍留下了一些破绽。本期来稿多数谈的是编校差错,由此可见校书之难。愿出版界同行共同努力,切实提高编校质量。
On the screen, King Yidan appears a bit different, so simple, so easy-going, live off a sister image; in the book, King Yidan also looks a little different, she likes to observe, like to think, rather than nagging Self-flaunt. It can be seen from this book that King Yidan can write. Although she is a essay about a thousand words, she is very conscientious about her layout, and she is not arbitrary; her language is simple and neat. She can often express her words without losing her literary style. What is particularly commendable is that, She can “give their own vision,” a lot of ideas out of the machine, but not in the article for the sake of meditation. Jing Yidan did not like to parade the blog, which made her to a certain extent avoid the mistakes in the literary and historical knowledge; but in the use of words, there are still some flaws. Most of the contributions to this issue are editing errors, we can see the hardship of school books. The publishing industry is willing to work together colleagues, and effectively improve the quality of editing.