论文部分内容阅读
“快适”判断在《判断力批判》中除了作为与美的判断和善的判断进行“对比”的一种判断类型外,它还有更加深刻的作用和意义。首先,从外在作用来说,它是康德在第三批判中通过“目的论”所建立的系统理论的对话背景。其次,从内在作用来说,(1)“快适”的判断与“美”的判断并列,构成了感性判断的两种类型;(2)对“快适”概念中“感觉”一词双重内涵的微妙辨析和区分,引出了在“美”的评判中对主体的内心状态进行描述和界定所需要的关键术语即“主观感觉”;(3)在对“快适”的批判中引出了“实践的目的”概念,由此就与“目的论判断力批判”产生了联系。
“Comfortable ” Judgment In “Critique of Judgment” it has a more profound role and significance than “Judgment” as a type of judgment in judging goodness of beauty. First, from an externality, it is the dialogue background of the systematic theory established by Kant in the third critique through Skopos theory. Second, from the perspective of intrinsic function, (1) the judgment of “quick adaptation” and the judgment of “beauty” are the two types of perception judgment; (2) The subtle discrimination and distinction of the dual connotation of “feeling ” leads to the key term needed to describe and define the inner state of the subject “subjective feeling ” in the evaluation of “beauty ”; ) Leads to the concept of “the purpose of practice” in the critique of “quick adaptation”, and thus the connection with “Criticism of Skopos Theory”.