论文部分内容阅读
作为人类语义研究中的经典理论之一,科林斯和奎廉提出的“可教的语言理解者”网络模型使我们在这一极富挑战的领域有了遵循的方向和可供借鉴的实验方法。但毫无疑问,这种模型存在着许多缺陷,我们无法用这种模型来科学合理地解释人类的各种语义记忆现象。在众多认知心理学家们针对TLC假设的质疑中可以得到一些启示,并在他们提出的改进模型基础上提出新的假设:人类在语义记忆受到包括意识阈上下的多种因素的影响,这些数目繁多、强度不同、表征形式各异的联系组成一个近混沌的状态,但在目标(也包括需求和适宜情境)的指引下,会有选择地激活某个或某些联系,于是该部分的联系就成为人最先意识的、显性的反应。
As one of the classical theories in the study of human semantics, the “teachable language comprehension” network model proposed by Corinth and Kuilry made us follow the direction and experimental methods that can be borrowed in this challenging field. But there is no doubt that this model has many flaws, and we can not use this model to scientifically and reasonably explain human semantic memory. There are some enlightenments from many cognitive psychologists in their questioning of the hypothesis of TLC, and based on the improved model they put forward, there is a new hypothesis that human beings are influenced by many factors, including the threshold of consciousness, in the memory of semantic memory A large number, different intensities, and different forms of representations constitute a nearly chaotic state, but one or some of the links are selectively activated under the guidance of objectives (also including needs and appropriate situations) Contact becomes the first conscious, dominant reaction.