论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国物权法》自2007年10月1日施行以来,对建筑物区分所有权相关内容作出了许多新的规定,对相关权益人的权利义务规定的更加明确,更有利于相关权益人拿起法律武器维护其合法权益,但实践中的具体问题还是难以解决。本文以《中华人民共和国物权法》和最高人民法院近日出台的《关于审理建筑物区分所有权纠纷案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》和《关于审理物业服务纠纷案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》为基奠,结合实务调查分析,针对我省在物业产权界定方面的法律法规中出现的“真空”地带,为我省的物业产权界定的立法方向及解决对策提出笔者自己的浅见。
Since the implementation of the “Property Law of the People’s Republic of China” on October 1, 2007, many new provisions have been made on the relevant contents of building ownership differentiation. The provisions on the rights and obligations of the relevant stakeholders have become clearer and more conducive to picking up the relevant rights and interests Legal weapons safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, but the specific problems in practice are still hard to solve. This article takes “People’s Republic of China Property Law” and the Supreme People’s Court recently promulgated the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Disputes over the Ownership Differentiation of Buildings” and the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Disputes over Property Services Disputes” In light of the investigation and analysis of practice, in light of the “vacuum” zone appearing in the laws and regulations on the definition of property rights in our province, I put forward my own opinions on the legislative direction and solution to the definition of property rights in our province.