论文部分内容阅读
经济学家厉以宁认为:过去,国企在所有制上清楚,但不等于产权清楚,产权是跟投资主体联系在一起的。我国国企的问题就在于投资主体缺位。因此,产权改革有以下三个内容:界定产权,明晰产权;所有制结构调整;健全、完善的法人治理结构。因此,欲使产权改革真正到位,那么至少应集中力量——中国·WTO 元年,国人对国企因体制而冒出的问题的抱怨声似乎渐高渐烈。其缘由是,连上市公司比如海尔股份有限公司,都居然没有自己独立于母公司——海尔集团的财务、采购、销售和生产维修等系统,这怎不令公众大为吃惊!其实,此等现象极为普遍。因此,子公司与母公司之间的关联交易爆出猫腻也就不难理解了。国企内部产权依旧,根子当在中
Li Yining, an economist, believes that in the past, state-owned enterprises were clearly defined in the ownership system, but they did not mean that the property rights were clear. Property rights were linked to the investors. The problem of China’s state-owned enterprises lies in the absence of investment subjects. Therefore, the property rights reform has the following three elements: defining property rights, clarifying property rights, adjusting the ownership structure, and improving the sound corporate governance structure. Therefore, if property rights reform is to be put in place, then at least strength should be concentrated. In the first year of the WTO in China, the people’s complaints about the problems that the state-owned enterprises have emerged due to the system appear to be increasing. The reason is that even a listed company such as Haier Co., Ltd. does not have its own independent financial system, procurement, sales, production and maintenance systems of its parent company, the Haier Group. This is not surprising to the public! In fact, this The phenomenon is extremely common. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand that the related transactions between the subsidiaries and the parent company are out of sight. The property rights of state-owned enterprises remain the same, but the root cause is