论文部分内容阅读
多年来,文献计量学一直在学术评价、图书馆服务、学科分析方面发挥着作用,该学科的理论与方法也因此引起了许多学者的关注与使用。但是,在学术评价与科研管理领域,文献计量方法在近几年的使用中存在越来越大的争议。通过全面分析2016年国外学者在文献计量学领域的最新研究,发现基于文献计量学视角的学术评价研究并未因为存在争议而消减,而是从不同角度去探索新的评价方法、评价指标、评价数据及评价理念,相关研究内容主要涉及引文分析研究、补充性计量研究、科研合作研究、科研绩效评价等方面。
Over the years, bibliometrics has been playing a role in academic evaluation, library services, and disciplinary analysis. The theories and methods of this subject have drawn many scholars’ attention and use. However, in the field of academic evaluation and research management, there has been increasing controversy over the use of bibliometrics in recent years. Through a comprehensive analysis of the latest researches in the field of bibliometrics by foreign scholars in 2016, it is found that the academic evaluation research based on the bibliometrics perspective has not diminished because of the controversy, but has explored new evaluation methods, evaluation indexes and evaluations from different angles Data and evaluation concept, the relevant research mainly involves citation analysis, supplementary measurement research, research cooperation, research performance evaluation and so on.