论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析比较一次性根管治疗法和常规法治疗慢性根尖炎的临床疗效和价值。方法:将我院口腔科收治的慢性根尖炎患者45例随机分为观察组和对照组,给予观察组以一次性根管治疗,对照组以常规多次根管治疗,治疗结束后,分析比较术后疼痛发生率以及治疗有效率。结果:观察组的术后疼痛发生率与对照组相比,无统计学意义(P>0.05),随访1个月,观察组的治疗总有效率高于对照组,经分析,差别具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:一次性根管治疗慢性根尖炎在治疗期间具有一定的痛苦,但是从长远来看,疗效显著,不但没有增加术后疼痛发生率,而且能够在极大改善患者状况的同时,减少多次治疗的经济损失,具有在临床应用的意义和价值。
Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy and value of one-time root canal therapy and routine method in the treatment of chronic apical inflammation. Methods: Forty-five patients with chronic apical inflammation received stomatology in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group received one-time root canal therapy. The control group received routine root canal therapy. After treatment, Compare the incidence of postoperative pain and treatment efficiency. Results: The incidence of postoperative pain in the observation group was not significantly different from that in the control group (P> 0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group after one month of follow-up. According to the analysis, the difference was statistically significant Significance (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Disposable root canal therapy of chronic apodization has some pain during treatment, but in the long term, the curative effect is significant, not only does not increase the incidence of postoperative pain, but also can greatly improve the patient’s condition at the same time, reduce more Sub-treatment of economic losses, with clinical significance and value.