论文部分内容阅读
本文报告对48例患者,右心导管法描记窦房结电图(SNE)及直按测定窦房传导时间(SACT_D)的结果。并与用早搏心房刺激法(Strauss法)和连续心房起博法(Naruta法)测定的SACT对照。对照组SACT_D75.5±17.8ms,病窦组SACT_D 171.7±39.4 ms, 二者比较有非常显著差异(P<0.01),直接法测定的SACT与两种闻接法测SACT均有良好的相关性。
This article reports 48 patients, right heart catheterization of sinus node electrocardiogram (SNE) and direct press determination of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT_D) results. And compared with the SACT control measured by the Strauss method and the Naruta method. SACT_D75.5 ± 17.8 ms in the control group and 171.7 ± 39.4 ms in the sick sinus group were significantly different (P <0.01). There was a good correlation between SACT measured by direct method and SACT measured by both methods .