论文部分内容阅读
从决策权、执行权、监督权既相互制约又相互协调的要求来讲,破解“谁来监督监督者”的难题需要建立专门针对监督权的问责机制。所谓监督权问责,是指监督权行使主体就其监督行为向多元监督者进行责任回应并据此接受监督失责惩罚的行为过程。问责主体、问责客体、权力行使、责任类型等不同体现出监督权问责与决策问责、执行问责之间的区别。在当前“强监督—弱制约”的控权模式下,监督权的被动性、从属性、分散性、事后性导致监督权问责的乏力和不足。为此,需要通过落实纪委的监督责任和完善人民监督员制度的方式建构监督权的内外部问责机制,以实现问责链条的闭合循环。
From the requirements of mutual restraint and mutual coordination of decision-making power, executive power and supervisory power, the solution to the problem of “who supervises the supervisor” needs to establish an accountability mechanism that is specific to the supervisory power. The so-called supervisory power accountability, refers to the exercise of the supervisory power of its supervisory behavior to the multiple supervisors to respond to the responsibility and thus accept the supervision of the default process of punishment. The difference between supervisory power accountability, accountability for decision-making and accountability implementation is the difference between the subject of accountability, the object of accountability, the exercise of power and the type of responsibility. Under the current “strong supervision - weak control” control mode, the passiveness, subordination, decentralization and ex post of supervisory power lead to the lack of supervision and accountability. Therefore, it is necessary to construct internal and external accountability mechanisms for supervisory power by implementing the supervisory responsibility of Commission for Discipline Inspection and perfecting the people supervisor system in order to achieve the closed cycle of the chain of accountability.