论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究ERAS快速康复技术于剖宫产应用效果观察.方法:于2020年6月至2021年6月我院妇产科收治满足剖宫产指征孕产妇96例为观察对象,依据剖宫产择期手术开展时间分组,对照组48例开展传统康复护理,干预组48例开展ERAS快速康复技术,比对剖宫产术后转归、不良手术结局及康复护理满意度.结果:干预组患者肛门排气时间、初始下床时间、术后住院时间短于对照组(P＜0.05);干预组剖宫产不良手术结局发生率低于对照组(P＜0.05);干预组孕产妇于孕期管理、分娩干预、产后指导、护患关系等方面满意评分高于对照组“,”Objective: To explore the effect of ERAS rapid rehabilitation technique in cesarean section. Methods: from June 2020 to June 2021 were meet obstetrics and gynecology hospital 96 cases of cesarean section indications maternal as observation object, on the basis of cesarean delivery for elective surgical procedures can be time group, control group 48 cases to carry out the traditional rehabilitation care, intervention group 48 cases in ERAS rapid rehabilitation technology, comparing outcomes after cesarean section, poor surgical outcome and rehabilitation nursing satisfaction. Results: The anal exhaust time, initial time out of bed and postoperative hospitalization time in the intervention group were shorter than those in the control group (P＜0.05). The incidence of adverse outcome of cesarean section in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P＜0.05). The satisfaction scores of pregnancy management, delivery intervention, postpartum guidance and nurse-patient relationship in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion: ERAS rapid rehabilitation technique is helpful to the postoperative outcomes of cesarean section, reduce the adverse surgical outcomes, and has a significant rehabilitation effect.