论文部分内容阅读
一林默涵同志在他的发表在《新文学史料》上的《胡风事件的前前后后》一文中提出了一个我非常赞成的观点:“对于历史上发生的事件,不同立场和不同观点的人,会有不同的看法和评价;因此,可以讨论或争论。但对于历史事件,首先要弄清‘它是什么样’,然后才能回答‘它为什么这样’。某一历史事件中的某一经过事实,可能有多种传说,却只能有一个是真实的,不可能有两个:非此即彼。历史不是泥巴或面团,不能由谁凭主观需要拿来随意捏塑”。回想当年,胡风以及“胡风分子”们也
In his article “Before and after the Hu Feng Incident” published in “Historical Materials of New Literature”, Comrade Lin Mohan put forward a view I very much agree with: “For events that have occurred in history, different positions and different views People can have different opinions and comments; therefore, they can be discussed or argued, but for historical events, it is first necessary to find out what ’it is’ and then to answer ’why it is’. Someone in a historical event After the fact that there may be many kinds of legends, only one of them can be true and no two of them are possible: history is not mud or dough, and it can not be controlled by subjective needs. Recall that year, Hu Feng and ”Hu Feng molecules " are also