论文部分内容阅读
司法便利化理念是在保障裁判公正的基础上,通过程序的重构来提高司法效率、提升司法可接近性、保障司法裁判的良好社会效果。城市基层法院不仅处于司法实践第一线,而且具备一定的司法资源配置权,故其可在司法便利化理念指导下将纠纷处理的部分权能向社区分流,通过合理运用社会资源为纠纷当事人提供程序上的便利性、提升纠纷当事人司法程序的参与性,使得“法治”理念充分融入市民社会之中,更好地为社会服务,为民众服务。上海市杨浦区人民法院在纠纷解决社区化的实践中已经实行了诸如“社区法官”、“社区巡回法庭”等卓有成效的尝试,但在现行的制度中仍存在理念上和技术上的可改进之处。本文旨在对其加以分析,并尝试提出初步完善建议。
The concept of judicial facilitation is to improve the judicial efficiency, improve the accessibility of judicature and ensure the good social effects of judicial adjudication through the reconstruction of the procedure on the basis of ensuring the impartiality of the judgments. Urban grassroots courts are not only in the forefront of judicial practice, but also have certain judicial resources allocation rights. Therefore, under the guidance of the judicial facilitation concept, urban grassroots courts can divert part of the power of disputes to the community and provide them with resources through the rational use of social resources Facilitate the participation of judicial parties involved in the disputes, and fully integrate the concept of “rule of law” into the civil society so as to better serve the community and serve the public. The People’s Court of Yangpu District of Shanghai has already carried out fruitful attempts such as “community judges” and “community circuit courts” in the practice of settling community disputes, but there are still ideological and technical attempts in the existing system Can be improved. The purpose of this paper is to analyze it and try to put forward some suggestions.