论文部分内容阅读
目的研究不同活动场所MSM人群一般特征、艾滋病知识及相关高危性行为状况。方法采用现况调查对酒吧/会所、浴池/公园、网络招募、其它来源型四类不同活动场所MSM人群,进行一对一匿名问卷调查。结果不同活动场所MSM人群在年龄、婚姻状况、文化程度、艾滋病知识知晓率上差异有统计学意义;网络招募型MSM多为“单一固定性伴(”65.4%),“多数为不固定性伴”比例最高的为浴池/公园型(26.8%),场所间差异有统计学意义;63.4%的MSM在调查前6个月有同性性行为,这一行为在不同场所间差异无统计学意义;28.3%的MSM有异性性行为,且不同场所间的MSM差异有统计学意义,其中浴池/公园型最高,为47.1%;不同场所MSM人群同性性行为时安全套使用率的差异有统计学意义,而异性性行为时差异无统计学意义。结论不同活动场所MSM具有不同的特征,其知识知晓率及艾滋病高危行为亦有差异。
Objective To study the general characteristics of MSM population, AIDS knowledge and related high-risk sexual behaviors in different venues. Methods Based on the status quo survey, one to one anonymous questionnaire was conducted on the MSM population in four different types of venues such as bars / clubs, bath / parks, internet recruitment and other sources. Results There were significant differences in age, marital status, educational level and HIV / AIDS awareness among MSM population in different places of activity. Most of the recruiting MSMs in the network were mostly single-sex partners (65.4%), most were not Fixed sex with the highest proportion of bath / park type (26.8%), the difference was statistically significant; 63.4% of the MSM 6 months before the survey had the same sex behavior, this behavior in different places, no difference Statistical significance; 28.3% of MSM had heterosexual behavior, and MSM differences between different places were statistically significant, of which the highest pool / park-type was 47.1%; different places of MSM population homosexual behavior condom use rate differences Statistical significance, while heterosexual behavior difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions MSM has different characteristics in different venues, and its awareness of knowledge and high-risk behavior of AIDS are also different.