论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比研究益气健脾化痰中药治疗法与传统西药抗感染治疗法在小儿肺炎恢复期的临床疗效差异。方法:选取80例从2014年1月至2015年3月期间在我院接受肺炎恢复期治疗的患儿,随机将其为观察组和对照组各40例,观察组患儿接受益气健脾化痰法治疗,对照组患儿接受常规西药抗感染治疗法,对比两组患儿在肺炎恢复期临床疗效的差异。结果:在本次研究试验中,观察组患儿经治疗后的总有效人数为38例,对照组患儿经治疗后的总有效人数为30例。观察组患儿临床疗效的总有效率(95.0%)显著高于对照组患儿临床疗效的总有效率(75.0%),结果差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在小儿肺炎恢复期,益气健脾化痰中药治疗法的临床效果明显优于西药抗感染治疗法,更具临床推广价值。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects of traditional Chinese medicine anti-infective therapy with traditional Chinese medicine in the recovery of children with pneumonia. Methods: Totally 80 children from January 2014 to March 2015 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients in the observation group and control group were randomly divided into observation group (40 cases) and control group Huatan treatment, children in the control group received conventional western medicine anti-infective therapy, the difference between the two groups of children in the recovery of clinical efficacy of pneumonia. Results: In this study, the total effective number of children in the observation group after treatment was 38 cases, and that of the control group after treatment was 30 cases. The total effective rate (95.0%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (75.0%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the recovery period of pediatric pneumonia, the clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine for invigorating the spleen and resolving phlegm is obviously better than the western medicine anti-infective therapy, which is more valuable for clinical promotion.