论文部分内容阅读
现代文明在技术理性的推动下造就了一个与传统社会相对立的物质极大丰富的现代社会。科技给人类带来巨大的物质财富,同时也带来了巨大的风险和灾难。相应的对现代性的批判也就集中在“技术批判”之上,形成了以认识论批判、意识形态批判和文化价值论批判等为特征的理性批判范式和以海德格尔的诗性技术观和福柯的技术权利谱系批判等为代表的非理性批判范式。风险社会理论的出现,将哲学反思建立在对现代技术的复杂性和丰富性的经验描述上,实现了技术批判的风险社会理论转向。这种转变将技术的选择和讨论纳入到公共领域甚至整个社会中来,当公众的科学民主观念、公共空间权利探讨等等这一系列问题重新成为了科学发展观和风险社会共同追问的东西的时候,我们也就发现了在风险社会理论的参考下去探讨科学发展观实现的可能性。风险社会理论研究的经验主义的路向、现实主义的指向都为科学发展观提供了更加广阔的可操作性以及可行性。
Under the impetus of technical rationality, modern civilization has created a modern society that is extremely rich in material resources and opposed to the traditional society. Technology brings enormous material wealth to mankind, but it also brings tremendous risks and disasters. The corresponding critique of modernity is also focused on “technical criticism”, forming a rational critical paradigm characterized by epistemological criticism, ideological criticism and cultural value criticism, and Heidegger’s poetic techniques View and Foucault’s criticism of the pedagogical rights of technology as the representative of the irrational critical paradigm. The emergence of risk society theory, based on philosophical reflection on the complexity and richness of modern technology to describe the experience, to achieve a technical critique of the risk of social theory shift. This change brings the selection and discussion of technologies into the public domain and even the entire society. When the public views on scientific democracy and the exploration of public space rights have become the common question pursued by the scientific development concept and the risk society In the meantime, we also discovered the possibility of realizing the scientific concept of development under the guidance of the theory of risk society. The empiricism and the realism of the research on the theory of risk society all provide more operability and feasibility for the scientific concept of development.