论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,在木材加工生产布局问题上,有两种对立的观点,即“林区派”和“城市派”。“林区派”认为,木材加工生产布局在林区或接近林区的城市合理,理由是接近原料产地,节省运输力,能够充分利用林区的“三剩”资源;“城市派”则认为,木材加工生产布局在城市合理,因为城市技术水平和管理水平高,可以利用社会公共设施,接近消费地,投资少,成本低,产品质量好。我认为,这两种观点都有一定的局限性,因为他们分析问题的方法都以定性分析为主,定量分析仅局限于微观(企业)的成本对比,而缺乏宏观经济的定量分析。这种缺乏宏观定量的分析方法很难得到全面正确的结论。笔者在本文中力图研究建立一个木材加工生产布局宏观经济模型,并通过模型来定量分析木材加工生产的宏观布局问题。
For a long time, there are two opposing views on the layout of wood processing and production, namely, “Lin Faction” and “urban faction.” The “Linqu School” believes that the layout of wood processing and production in the forest area or near the forest city is reasonable on the grounds that close to the origin of raw materials to save transport capacity, can take full advantage of the “three left” resources in the forest area; “Urban School” The layout of wood processing and production is reasonable in the cities. Because of the high level of technical and management level in the city, it can make use of social public facilities and reach the consumption areas with less investment, low cost and good product quality. In my opinion, both of these views have some limitations. Because they analyze the problems mainly in the qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis is confined to the micro (enterprise) cost comparison, but lack of a quantitative analysis of the macroeconomy. This lack of macroscopic quantitative analysis is difficult to get a comprehensive and correct conclusion. In this paper, I try to study the establishment of a macroeconomic model of wood processing and production layout, and through the model to quantitative analysis of the macro-layout of wood processing and production issues.