论文部分内容阅读
從去年十月以来,在全国範围内,展開了一個批判胡適、俞平伯、胡風的资產階級唯心主義的思想运動,這個運動的中心是以馬克思主义的辯證唯物論反對資產階級的唯心論,是兩种根本不同的世界观和方法論的針鋒相對的鬥爭。這是我國過渡時期思想戰线上的一場嚴重的階級鬥爭。但是,這場思想鬥爭的偉大意义,是不是所有從事於歷史科學研究和歷史教学工作的同志都能深刻理解呢?那就不尽如此。許多同志對资產階級唯心主义的感覺是銳敏的,對資產階級唯心史觀在歷史研究和历史教學上的影響是清醒的,因此,他們能够衝鋒陷陣積極參加這場思想鬥爭。但是,也有許多同志對這埸思想鬥爭的严重意義,感覺不靈,認識不清,彷彿與自己无关,採取了袖手旁觀的態度,對於報紙雜誌上發表的許多文章和各种學術討論会一概無兴趣。還有一些同志對這場
Since last October, throughout the country, a bourgeois idealist movement that criticizes Hu Shih, Yu Pingbo and Hu Feng has been launched. The centerpiece of this campaign is to oppose bourgeois idealism with Marxist dialectical materialism. The diametrically opposed struggle between two fundamentally different worldviews and methodologies. This is a serious class struggle on the ideological front during the transitional period in our country. However, is not the great significance of this ideological struggle understood by all the comrades engaged in historical scientific research and historical teaching? That is not so. Many comrades are sharp-minded about the feeling of bourgeois idealism. They are sober-minded about the historical study and history teaching of the bourgeois idealist outlook. Therefore, they can actively participate in this ideological struggle. However, many comrades also feel that they have no interest in understanding the serious significance of this ominous struggle for ideological struggle. They have taken a stand-in attitude and are not interested in many articles published in newspapers and magazines or in various academic seminars . Some comrades also made this remark