论文部分内容阅读
伦理学的范式转换,不仅与人类文明的发展方向和目标密切相关,而且与哲学本身的奠基原则直接关联。就奠基原则而论,哲学经历了以本体论为第一哲学的古典形态,以知识论为第一哲学的近代形态,在当代出现了以“伦理学为第一哲学”的第三形态。然而恰恰是这第三形态,无论是哲学本身还是伦理学范式本身,都出现了不甚清晰、需要我们加以辨析的深层理论难题。邓安庆教授曾在《分析进路的伦理学范式批判》一文中,首次做出了对分析进路伦理学范式的系统批判,认为分析的伦理学脱离了社会文化的交往语境、摒弃了哲学的存在论根基,而去对伦理学语言单纯进行语义的逻辑分析,必然是个“自败的事业”。此论一出,立刻激起了学界的热烈争论。本组笔谈主要聚焦以下问题与之展开深层论辩,即如何理解分析伦理学和元伦理学之间的关系?如何理解分析进路的伦理范式的意义?如何走出分析进路伦理学的限制?如何理解伦理学与存在论的关系等等。
The paradigm shift of ethics is not only directly related to the direction and goal of the development of human civilization, but also directly related to the founding principle of philosophy itself. As far as the foundation principle is concerned, philosophy has undergone the classical form with ontology as the first philosophy, the modern form with the epistemology as the first philosophy, and the third form with “ethics as the first philosophy” . However, it is precisely this third form, both the philosophy itself and the paradigm of ethics itself, have encountered deep theoretical problems that are not very clear and need us to be analyzed. For the first time, Professor Deng Anqing made a systematic criticism of the analysis of the ethics paradigm in his article “A Critique of the Ethical Paradigm of Approaches to the Path”, arguing that the analytic ethics is out of context of social and cultural interaction and abandons philosophy Of the existentialist foundation, and to go to the ethical language simple semantic logic analysis, must be a “self-defeated cause.” This theory came out, immediately aroused heated debate in the academic community. How to understand the relationship between analytical ethics and meta-ethics? How to understand the meaning of analyzing the ethical paradigm?? How to get out of the analysis of ethics?? How? Understand the relationship between ethics and ontology and so on.