论文部分内容阅读
最近,笔者看到一篇关于林业问题的讲话,其中提出:“把集体山林作为两山(自留山、责任山)落实到户,从所有权和经营权分离的理论看,是无可非议的,所有权重新明确,实行‘两权分离’,集体的山林是可以划到户经营的,划了‘两山’并不改变所有制,根据社会主义经济改革理论,‘两山’到户从实践到理论都没有错,对调动群众积极性,加强植树造林,保护森林,效果都是明显的。”如果笔者没有理解错的话,这段话实
Recently, I read a speech on forestry issues, in which I put forward: “It is beyond reproach that the collective forests should be implemented as two mountains (self-retaining mountains and responsible mountains) from the perspective of the separation of ownership and management rights Clearly, the implementation of ’separation of powers’, collective forests can be zoned to households operating, zoned ’two mountains’ does not change ownership, according to the theory of socialist economic reform, ’two mountains’ home from practice to theory are not Wrong, mobilize the enthusiasm of the people, strengthen afforestation, forest protection, the effect is obvious. ”If the author did not understand the wrong words, the truth