论文部分内容阅读
国家保密局正在推动一场20年来罕见的保密检查。在互联网时代,保密形势在各国空前严峻。不仅中国,世界大国的保密制度均趋于越来越严苛,包括注重信息公开的美国。但同时,政府信息公开已成为满足公民知情权的基本方式,保密与公开在中国延续了十余年的博弈,连一向神秘的保密局也逐渐出现在公众视野。在最新的保密法修改中,一方面,参与讨论者提出缩小定密范围、防止滥用定密权等主张;另一方面,修法者也强调了“越开放,越要保密”的主张。与此相关,学者、律师与媒体从业者尤其成为了走在保密与公开边缘的特殊群体。他们的言论如何做到既增益公众知情权,又不越保密雷区?这不但有赖于个人强化保密意识,亦有赖于保密的进一步法治化。
The State Secrecy Bureau is promoting a rare two-year confidential examination. In the Internet age, the security situation in all countries unprecedentedly grim. Not only China but also the world’s major powers have increasingly stringent confidentiality regimes, including the United States, which emphasizes information disclosure. However, at the same time, the government information disclosure has become the basic way to satisfy the citizens’ right to know. The secrecy and openness have continued for more than ten years in China. Even the secret security bureau has gradually emerged in the public view. On the other hand, the revisionists also emphasized the proposition that “the more open, the more secretive” should be adopted. On the one hand, the participants in the discussion put forward the proposal of narrowing the scope of confidentiality and preventing the abuse of definite rights. Related to this, academics, lawyers and media practitioners are among the special groups that are on the brink of confidentiality and openness. How can their rhetoric not only increase the public’s right to information but also ensure that minefields are kept quiet? This depends not only on the individual’s awareness of secrecy but also on the further rule of law under the law of secrecy.