论文部分内容阅读
退稿工作是编辑流程中的一个重要环节,通过退稿作者获得了一个人才培养的机会,同时科技期刊编辑也得到一个推敲学习和提高的过程,因此科技期刊编辑对录用稿和退稿应给予同样的重视。针对不同类型的退稿应采取不同的方法处理:学术水平不高的稿件应建议作者做更深入的研究;实验设计不合理的稿件则应建议作者重新设计实验方案,从而使自己所要论证的结论更加合理;论据不足的稿件则建议作者补充实验,获得充足论据。通过编者作者之间的交流沟通,不断提高期刊质量,有利于编者与作者的业务水平的提高。
The rejection work is an important part of the editing process. An opportunity for personnel training is obtained through the authors who return the articles. Meanwhile, editors of sci-tech periodicals also get a process of studying and improving scrutiny. Therefore, editors of sci-tech periodicals should Give the same attention. Different types of rejected papers should be handled differently: manuscripts with low academic level should be recommended to the author for further research; manuscripts with unreasonable experimental design should be suggested to the author to redesign the experimental program, so that the conclusion of his argument More reasonable; argumentative manuscripts suggest that the authors supplement the experiment, access to sufficient arguments. Through the communication between editors and authors, improving the quality of journals is conducive to the improvement of the professional level of editors and authors.