论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨手动负压吸引(manual vacuum aspiration,MVA)装置行人工流产术的安全性、可靠性及临床应用价值。方法随机抽取江苏省溧阳市计划生育指导站计划生育手术室欲行人工流产的正常妊娠5～10周的妇女,分为A、B两组,各250例。分别用MVA及传统电动负压吸引器进行人工流产手术。结果两组在术中出血量、手术时间、术中痛感和术后出血时间4个方面的差异有统计学意义,术后月经复潮时间差异无统计学意义。结论 MVA方式是一种安全、可靠且较易操作的手术方法,可比传统电动负压吸引器方式更有效保护妇女身心健康,有独特的性能优势,有很好的临床应用价值。
Objective To investigate the safety, reliability and clinical value of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) device in artificial abortion. Methods A total of 250 women with normal pregnancies of 5 to 10 weeks were randomly selected from family planning operating room of family planning operating room of Liyang City, Jiangsu Province. Respectively, with MVA and traditional vacuum suction device for artificial abortion. Results There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, intraoperative pain and postoperative bleeding time, and there was no significant difference in postoperative menstrual resuscitation time. Conclusions MVA is a safe, reliable and easy-to-operate surgical method, which can protect women’s physical and mental health more effectively than the traditional electric vacuum suction device. It has unique performance advantages and good clinical value.