论文部分内容阅读
“默示意思自治”是由法官来推定当事人在订立合同时意图选法但未明确地选择准据法的意图,如果不给予法官必要的参考因素或者加以限制就会无法得知推出的意思到底是法官真意还是当事人真意;这样,当事人的意思自治就会遭到破坏和扭曲。实践中没有很好地对法官作一个限定,应从列举法官在推定“默示意思自治”时的考虑因素,如包括但不限于合同的签订地、履行地、双方当事人的国籍、合同中仲裁条款或管辖条款、合同使用的格式条款等入手,在综合考查这些多种因素后,为当事人完善其意思自治。
“Autonomy of Meaning Autonomy ” is the intention of a judge to presume that a party intends to choose a law at the time of conclusion of the contract but has not explicitly chosen the law of conformity. If the judge is not given the necessary reference or restrictions, The meaning is the true meaning of the judge or the true meaning of the parties; in this way, the autonomy of the parties will be destroyed and distorted. Judges are not well defined in practice. Consideration should be given to the judges’ consideration in presuming “autonomous autonomy of autonomy ”, including, but not limited to, the place of signing, the place of performance, the nationality of both parties, the contract Arbitration clause or jurisdiction clause, and the terms and conditions of the contract. After comprehensively examining these various factors, they will improve their autonomy of means for the parties concerned.