论文部分内容阅读
把“设计批评”狭义地理解为对于设计作品的艺术批评是有局限的。当我们把“设计”看作一个动词,那么设计产业链条中的政策环境、甲方(广告主)、受众(消费者)、媒体、设计师及其行业组织、教育体制与学术生产机制的批评,都属于“设计批评”的范围。本期所刊发的两篇文章,就是围绕中国设计产业的问题而展开。2009年北京的“世界设计大会”已经离我们远去,但这次会议留给我们的思考却没有停止。王敏教授的访谈,促使我们思考“世界设计大会”之后中国设计业应该重视的时代议题。本刊今年起开始倡导的“新农村建设与中国设计业”的议题也受到了越来越多学界同仁的关注。“为农村设计”的起点,首先是对于农村设计用户的了解。在这方面,柳沙博士通过问卷调查的方法,对于农村设计用户进行过长期的实证研究,她对于相关问题有较深入的思考,自然也是具有“发言权”的。特邀主持人/祝帅
Narrowing “Design Criticism ” in a narrow sense as having limited artistic criticism of the design work. When we consider “design” as a verb, we design the policy environment in the industrial chain. Party A (advertisers), audiences (consumers), media, designers and their trade organizations, education systems and academic production mechanisms Criticism, all belong to “design criticism ” range. The two articles published in this issue are based on the problems of China’s design industry. The “World Design Conference” in Beijing in 2009 has gone away from us, but the thinking left at this meeting has not stopped. Interview with Prof. Wang Min prompted us to think about the issue of the times that China’s design industry should pay attention to after World Design Congress. The issue of “New Countryside Construction and China Design Industry” initiated by this magazine since the beginning of this year has also attracted the attention of more and more academic colleagues. “For the rural design ” starting point, first of all for the rural design users to understand. In this regard, Dr. Liu Shao conducted a long-term empirical study of rural design users through a questionnaire survey. She has more thought on related issues and naturally has a “say”. Invited host / wish handsome