论文部分内容阅读
钱钟书先生并非专业的历史学家,他对文学虚构与历史叙事的大量论述,基本上是基于“打通”的学术宗旨与追求。借助于新历史主义文论,我们发现钱钟书关于“文史互通”、“史蕴诗心”、“六经皆史”等问题的高见卓识,
Mr. Qian Zhongshu is not a professional historian. His extensive discussion of fiction and historical narrative is basically based on the academic purpose and pursuit of “getting through”. With the help of the neo-historicist literary theory, we find that Qian Zhongshu’s insightful and conscientious views on issues such as “exchange of literature and history”, “memory of poetry in history”, “history of six classics”