论文部分内容阅读
关于脑电图(EEG)对热性惊厥小儿监护价值的报告,一直存在分歧意见。引起争论的主要原因是由于对热性惊厥的定义的不同理解及对惊厥类型的识别。美国国立卫生研究所提出的定义是:排除颅内感染迹象和有肯定性原因的惊厥,以及不存在无热惊厥史小儿的发热惊厥,但使用这样术语仍不能得出一个严格的定义,在某些情况下,符合以上术语的仍不能证明是热性惊厥。在分型上,Livingstone 提出简
There have been disagreements about the report of EEG on the value of pediatric care in febrile seizures. The main reason for the controversy is the different understanding of the definition of febrile seizures and the identification of types of seizures. The NIH’s definition is: to exclude signs of intracranial infection and affirmative seizures and febrile convulsions in children without a history of febrile seizures, but the use of such terms still does not lead to a strict definition of a In some cases, consistent with the above terms still can not prove that febrile seizures. In typing, Livingstone proposed Jane