论文部分内容阅读
《论语·颜渊》有这么一段记载: “子贡问政。子(孔子)曰:‘足食、足兵、民信之矣。’贡曰:‘必不得已而去,于斯三者何先?’曰:‘去兵’。子贡曰:‘必不得已而去,于是二者何先?’曰:‘去食。自古皆有死,民无信不立。’”汉代思想家王充,在读了这段记载后,反问:“使治无食,民饿,弃礼义;礼义弃,信安立?”在封建社会里,“礼义”是什么货色,我们暂且不去管它。这里要说的是:王充这种不以书上说的是为是、非为非的大胆怀疑的精神,倒是很值得我们在读书、学习时效法的。古人不是说:“学则须疑”吗?这就是说,读书要多动脑筋,主动地提出一些疑问来,并且追根穷底,一直到弄明白了为止。这样对丰
“Analects Yan Yuan” There is such a record: “Zigong political affairs. Zi (Confucius) said: ’Foot food, foot soldiers, the people of the letter carry on.’ Gong said: ’will have to go, where are the three? ’Say:’ to the soldiers. ’Son tribute said:’ will have to go, so where both? ’Said:’ Go eat. Since ancient times are dead, the people without a letter not stand. ’”Han Dynasty thinker Wang Chong, read After this record, we asked: “What makes” righteousness and righteousness “in the feudal society? What we should say here is: Wang Chong’s attitude of not daring to say that this book is right and not right and wrong is really worth our while studying and learning. The ancients did not say: ”Learn from suspicion"? That is to say, reading should be more brains, take the initiative to put forward some questions, and chase the end of the poor, until it is understood. This abundance