论文部分内容阅读
1986年4月,美军以打击“恐怖主义”为由,对利比亚的6个军事目标进行了空袭,共动用空、海军飞机200多架,平均每个目标用30多架,不可谓不是“杀鸡用牛刀”。1989年底,美军入侵巴拿马,出动的兵力是巴拿马城及其附近地区巴国防军和民兵的3倍;动用的飞机和直升机是巴军的8倍,装甲车是巴军的4倍,野战火炮和追击炮则是巴军的3倍,同样摆出了一付“杀鸡用牛刀”的架势。纵观近期几场局部战争,军事力量优势的一方无不采用了“牛刀杀鸡”的作战方式。那么,作战行动为何不遵循节约用兵的原则,而要“杀鸡用牛刀”呢?
In April 1986, the U.S. military conducted air strikes on six military targets in Libya on the grounds of cracking down on “terrorism.” Using more than 200 air and navy aircraft and using an average of more than 30 aircraft per target, the U.S. military can not but “kill Chicken chopper. ” At the end of 1989, the U.S. forces invaded Panama, sending three times as many troops as the Pakistani Defense Force and the militia in and around Panama City. The aircraft and helicopters used were eight times those of the Pakistani Army and four times more than the Pakistani armored vehicles. Field and artillery It is 3 times the Pakistani Army, also put a pair of “chickens with choppers,” the posture. Throughout the recent partial wars, the superiority of the military forces all adopted the tactic of “slashing knives and chickens.” So, why combat operations do not follow the principle of saving soldiers, but to “kill chickens with chopsticks?”