论文部分内容阅读
财物是否被权利人占有是区分盗窃罪与侵占罪的核心,由此如何认识刑法中的占有是区分此罪与彼罪的必要条件。本文的基本观点是,刑法中的占有更强调事实性支配;占有意思不是认定占有的必要条件,而只是在事实性支配很微弱时起补充认定作用;遗忘物必须是脱离占有之物,短暂遗忘以及处于他人事实性支配领域内的财物,不论权利人主观上是否遗忘都不属于遗忘物。
Whether the property is occupied by the right holder is the core of the crime of distinction between theft and embezzlement. Therefore, how to recognize the possession in the criminal law is the necessary condition to distinguish this crime from the other. The basic idea of this article is that the possession of criminal law places more emphasis on factual domination. Possession of meaning is not a prerequisite for the determination of possession, but only complements the assertion when the factual dominance is very weak. The forgotten thing must be temporarily detached from possession. As well as the belongings in the factual realm of others, no matter whether the obligees’ subjective forgetting are forgotten.