论文部分内容阅读
由于职业的关系,笔者爱把报上文章分类收集剪贴,以求借鉴。当我闲来无事翻阅剪贴的有关领导人物通讯时,无意中发现,不少文章在某一点上惊人地相似,这就是:前任为盾后任为矛。为表现现任主要领导的能力、魄力、政绩,往往把“前任”领导时期写得一塌糊涂,什么人心散、干部懒、管理差、半停产,什么效益一年不如一年,到了倒闭边缘,然后再笔锋一转,大写“现任”主要领导的大刀阔斧,力挽狂澜,很少有说“现任”是在“前任”的基础上拼出来的。 先抑后扬,造成反差,文章的力度绝对够劲。但带来的负面影响也不容忽视。负面影响之一是,有的“前任”领导也拿着报纸来了,上面的文章是写他当“现任”的时候的,写法一样;不一样的是,笔锋所
Due to the professional relationship, I love the newspaper articles on the classification of scrapbooking, in order to learn from. When I was busy reading the scrapbook about the leaders of communication, inadvertently found that many articles at a surprising similarity, this is: the predecessor of the spear as a shield after the spear. In order to show the capabilities, courage and performance of the incumbent leaders, they tend to write a mess during the leadership of the “predecessor”, lose heart to anybody, lazy cadres, manage poorly, suspend production for half a year, fail in efficiency for one year, reach the edge of collapse, and then Rather than writing that the “incumbent” is spelled out on the basis of “predecessor”, it is seldom that the main leaders of the “current incumbent” capitalize on the situation in a radical way. Xianyihouyang, causing contrast, the article’s strength is absolutely strong enough. However, the negative impact can not be ignored. One of the negative effects is that some “predecessor” leaders also come in newspapers. The article above is about the time when he wrote “incumbency.” The difference is that the writing style