论文部分内容阅读
解构主义误读理论之修辞维度的代表批评家是德里达、德·曼和米勒。误读的根源被归结为文学语言的修辞性特征,在语言修辞中比喻义优于字面义,寓言高于象征,因此文学批评需要以修辞性的阅读来代替一般性阅读对字面义的推崇,以碎片化的寓言式解读来取代同一性的象征。在批评方法上,无论是德里达的边缘解构策略、德·曼对“语法的修辞化”的分析,还是米勒对文本寄生性和重复现象的阐释,都是通过挖掘文本自身矛盾性来达到颠覆传统阐释的目的,显示了文本中反逻辑的异质性因素对统一结构的消解。
Representative critics of the rhetorical dimension of deconstruction misreading theory are Derrida, De Mann and Miller. The root of misreading is attributed to the rhetorical feature of literary language. In the rhetoric of language, metaphor is superior to literal meaning, and allegorical is higher than symbolism. Therefore, literary criticism needs rhetorical reading instead of esteem of literal meaning in general reading, Replace the symbolism of identity with the fragmentary allegorical interpretation. In the way of criticizing, both Derrida’s deconstruction strategy, De Man’s analysis of the “rhetoric” of grammar and Miller’s interpretation of textual parasitism and repetition are all based on digging the contradictions of the text To achieve the purpose of subverting the traditional interpretation of the text shows the anti-logical heterogeneity of the unified structure of the digestion.